Review the records
With authorised sharing: sources, case history and open questions. Submission to an authority’s own system is a separate step.
NamicGreen – Mallorca's environmental memory.
Places. Evidence. Context.
NamicGreen
Mallorca's environmental memory.
For residents, local initiatives and authorities: observations, evidence and follow-up visits in one case file. So others can understand what happened and what remains open.
Research and backgroundExplore historical cases. Pilot in preparation; new reports paused.
Historical map view · Manacor© Mapbox · © OpenStreetMap
From place to outcome
A workflow that connects each case, its evidence and follow-up.
One case file brings together observations, evidence, actions and later checks. Each new visit adds to the existing history.
- 01
Find
Locate pollution on land or in water.
- 02
Evidence
Bind photos, location and affected area to the same case.
- 03
Change
Coordinate and record actions. Check the outcome afterwards.
- 04
Revisit
Return to the place and record what remains or stays open.
For public authorities and specialist teams
Understand the case. Continue the work.
Sources, previous steps and open questions in one place — so specialist teams can follow a case and pick up the work after a handover.
Develop AI assistance
Source-linked summaries and drafts of next steps are planned. Their benefits and review workload still need to be studied.
Make professional decisions
Professionals review evidence and explain decisions. Later follow-up records what has actually changed.
AIJIM · a separate protocol
Evidence stays reviewable. People decide.
AIJIM is a protocol independent of NamicGreen. It describes how evidence, its processing and human authorisation are bound to a specific version and its publication.
NamicGreen uses AIJIM as its foundation and is planning and developing its own independent implementation for environmental case files. Full protocol implementation and conformance testing are still in progress.
A reviewable version does not confirm environmental conditions. Today's case-file export is not evidence of an AIJIM publication.
Read the protocol specificationPublic preprint · arXiv:2609.17631v2- 01Source
- 02Case-file version
- 03Human authorisation
- 04Published version
Sources and implementation status
Technical integrity does not confirm environmental conditions. Sources and conclusions still need professional assessment.
Scientific foundations
Scientific foundations and the Mallorca pilot.
The Evidence-First Reference Model and the AIJIM specification are research by Torsten Olivi Tiltack and co-authors at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). NamicGreen builds on these independent scientific works. They are not research publications by NamicGreen.
The earlier FTC paper describes the 2024 NamicGreen pilot in Mallorca. This direct pilot connection is part of our development history.
Academic study planning · NamicGreen as the application context · no comparative results yet
How does AI change the professionally justified handling of several environmental cases when public authorities have limited time?
Explore the study approach
The planned study distinguishes clearer presentation from genuinely new information and looks at the other cases too. The aim is to learn where AI helps, where it adds review work and whether other cases receive less attention. It also plans to examine a specified AIJIM implementation for releasing and checking particular dossier versions. A technical check of a version does not replace professional assessment of the environmental case.
All comparison groups use NamicGreen. The study therefore does not isolate the effect of the platform or environmental memory itself.
Reference literature and its connection to NamicGreen
AIJIM: A Scalable Model for Real-Time AI in Environmental Journalism
Historical Mallorca pilot: Torsten Tiltack published this paper under his then affiliation, NamicGreen Research Group. It reports on the 2024 pilot, not the performance of today’s platform.
Read publicationFTC 2025 · Springer · DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-07989-3_26An Evidence-First Reference Model for Trustworthy AI in Business Information Systems
Independent UTS research that NamicGreen draws on as an architectural foundation. Not a NamicGreen publication or evidence of the platform’s environmental effects.
Read publicationBIS 2026 · Springer · DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-26363-6_7Making AI-Assisted Claims Independently Challengeable: Publication Authority and a Protocol for Falsifiable Publication Records
Independent UTS research on verifiable publication states that informs NamicGreen’s development. Not a NamicGreen publication. Bounded technical evaluation, not field validation or product approval.
Read publicationarXiv:2609.17631v2
Field history, development and personal research affiliation
Mallorca is the starting point.
The historical NamicGreen film archive documents environmental reporting, site visits and follow-up stories. It is now available on the original main channel under the name TechJournal.
These films present observations and assessments from their time. They are not a current survey and do not alone establish lasting environmental improvement.
Explore the field and film archiveWatch the FTC 2025 talkFrom a report to an environmental case others can continue.
Our aim is a reviewable environmental memory: observations, evidence, human decisions, documented actions and the next inspection stay connected. For councils, operators and researchers, even when people or responsibilities change.
Our current focus is Mallorca. Real deployment requires its own professional, legal and operational approval; a development milestone does not replace it.
Discuss a specific use caseEXIST Startup Grant
From a science-based idea to a controlled environmental pilot.
An EXIST Startup Grant supports the development of NamicGreen. Details of the funded project are listed here.
- Project
- NamicGreen
- Grant reference
- 03EGTTH025
- Grant recipient
- IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH
- Funding period
- 1 January–31 December 2026
Funding does not constitute certification, product approval, scientific validation or endorsement of results produced by NamicGreen.
What the information means
Make sense of the evidence.
Photos, map points and actions tell different parts of a case history. Their context matters when assessing them.
- 01
Review the hints
An automated hint stays a hint until a person has reviewed it.
- 02
Read the map in context
The density of reported cases measures documentation activity, not pollution prevalence.
- 03
Keep responsibilities clear
NamicGreen structures evidence and workflows; it does not replace an authority, a laboratory or a legal decision.
- 04
Check the outcomes
A documented action does not establish lasting impact. That requires a return to the place.
One shared memory
Useful from the first observation to the follow-up visit.
Residents, authorities, response partners, local initiatives and researchers look at the same place from different perspectives. The case file keeps the context together.
Residents and local initiatives
Explore historical cases on the map and view their evidence.
Public atlasAuthorities and response partners
Review evidence, coordinate action and keep open findings visible.
Request a pilotScience and monitoring
Record monitoring effort, visits with no issues observed and missing data separately.
Request a pilotLand and infrastructure operators
Keep places, responsibilities, interventions and follow-up in one reviewable trail.
Request a pilotInstitutional contact
What does your team need in its environmental work?
Talk to NamicGreen about existing records, open cases or a joint trial. Together, we can explore whether a pilot fits your work.
Request a pilot
Originating in Mallorca
So the next visit does not start from scratch.
NamicGreen grows from environmental observations in Mallorca. Public historical cases show the starting point. We are seeking conversations with authorities, specialist teams and partners for the next pilot.